效率与正义:一场经济学与法学的对话

property right在经济学中被翻译成“产权”,而在法学中被翻译成“财产权”。从表面看,两者的含义大同小异;但在实际操作过程中,两者的价值取向截然不同。由此体现了传统经济学与传统法学的局限性,凸显出效率与正义之间的紧张与冲突。1973年,美国芝加哥大学法学院波斯纳教授《法律的经济分析》出版,使这种局面有了根本改观。但在此后很长时期内,这种改观只是由法学家单方面作出的努力。2000年以来,由萨缪·鲍尔斯、赫伯特·金迪斯和恩斯特·费尔为代表的经济学家终于对此作出了回应,试图在主流经济学框架内为正义之维寻求合理的地位。在他们最近发表的一系列文献中,正义不仅内生于效率,而且是效率得以维持的重要条件之一。

Efficiency and Justice : A dialogue between economics and law

Property right has different corresponding wordsin Chinese economics community andlaws com-munity .It seems si milar but in practice quite different they are . This difference i mplies the localization ofboth traditional economics and laws , which suggests the conflicts between efficiency and justice .1973 thebook Economic Analysis of Law by Pro . Posner was published, which changed the i mpasse . But a longti me since that there has been endeavor onlyfromlegists .These years ,after 2000 ,some economists ,suchas Samule Bowles , Herbert Gintis and Enst Fehr replied this problem. They tried to find the logical sta-tion of justice di mension within the frame of the main streameconomics .In some works they reported re-cently ,justice is endogenesis in efficiency and ani mportant condition for efficiency to hold.