基于地方规定的调解与诉讼衔接问题研究

行政纠纷因行政机关管理行为而起,行政机关有义务先行处理行政纠纷,而不应当将自己引发的纠纷全部甩手给法院,应充分利用行政调解在解决行政争议方面的优势,减轻人民法院的负担。由于缺乏统一的规定,行政调解制度虽在我国遍地开花却五花八门,但无论如何都不应否定行政调解独立纠纷解决渠道的地位。另外,出于对相对人诉权的保护,调解与诉讼的衔接是不可回避的问题,对此,可从受案范围与效力衔接两方面切入。以合理性、合法性作为行政调解与诉讼受案范围的区分标准不符合实践,而应以裁量行政行为作为调解、诉讼受案范围衔接的纽带。当事人自愿达成的调解协议,在不违背法律强制性规定的情况下具有确定力,法院应对其所涉的有效事项不再处理,巩固行政调解的成果,避免行政与司法的资源浪费。

Research on the Connection Between Mediation and Litigation Based on Local Regulations

Administrative disputes arise due to the management actions of administrative agencies.Administrative agencies are obliged to deal with administrative disputes first.They should not give up all the disputes they have caused to the courts.Therefore,they should make full use of the advantages of administrative mediation in resolving administrative disputes and reduce the burden of the courts.Lack of uniform regulations,although the administrative mediation systems are popular in our country,there are many different types of administrative mediation systems,and in any case,the administrative mediation as an independent dispute resolution channel should not be denied.In addition,out of the protection of the procedure rights of the private party,the connection between mediation and litigation is an unavoidable issue.This can be solved from the scope and effectiveness of the mediation.Taking reasonableness and legitimacy as the standard for distinguishing between the scope of administrative mediation and litigation does not conform to practice,and the administrative act of discretion should be used as the link between the scope of mediation and litigation.The mediation agreement voluntarily reached by the parties has certainty as long as it does not violate the mandatory provisions of the law.The court should no longer deal with the effective matters involved,consolidate the results of administrative mediation,and avoid the waste of administrative and judicial resources.