| 走出价值选择的困境--论我国刑事诉讼价值取向 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈国亮. 走出价值选择的困境--论我国刑事诉讼价值取向[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004, 24(3): 93-96 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈国亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中央民族大学,法学院,北京,100081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "效率优先、兼顾公正"的相对工具主义价值主张,以及"打击犯罪与保障人权并重"的价值平衡主张,均不可能正确解决我国刑事诉讼的价值取向问题.刑事诉讼价值冲突的本质是国家权力与公民权利的中突.确立"人权保障优先"和"程序公正优先"的价值取向,是实现"人民民主"的宪法精神、推动刑事司法文明建设、走出价值选择困境的必由之路.
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事诉讼 价值选择 国家权力 公民权利 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-433X(2004)03-0093-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-02-10 |
Getting out of the Value Selection Predicament--On China''''s Criminal Procedure Orientation of Value |
| |
| CHEN Guo-liang. Getting out of the Value Selection Predicament--On China''''s Criminal Procedure Orientation of Value[J]. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities:Humanities and Social Science, 2004, 24(3): 93-96 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Guo-liang |
| |
| Abstract: | Giving priority to efficiency, giving consideration to justice simultaneously" is a proposition of instrumentalism while "putting emphasis on both attacking criminals and safeguarding human rights" is a proposition of value balance. Neither is the solution to criminal procedure orientation of value. The value selection of "giving priority to human rights" and "giving priority to procedure justice" is the only way to realize "people's democracy", push forward criminal legislation construction and get out of the value selection predicament. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal procedure value selection state power citizen right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
