首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论法官惩戒之事由
引用本文:汪贻飞.论法官惩戒之事由[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,24(4):124-130.
作者姓名:汪贻飞
作者单位:北京大学,法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:英美法系国家或大陆法系国家的法官惩戒事由主要包括司法内不当行为和司法外不当行为两个部分,而我国司法实践中,法官惩戒事由除上述两个方面的内容外,还包括"错案追究"和"业绩考核"。为完善我国法官惩戒制度,未来应当在逐渐扩大司法外不当行为的范围、为法官惩戒设置禁区、消除业绩考核和错案追究制度给法官带来的消极影响等几个方面努力,使法官惩戒逐渐从"行为、结果混合主义"转向"行为主义"。

关 键 词:不当行为  行为主义  错案追究  业绩考核

On the Judge Disciplinary Subjects
WANG Yi-fei.On the Judge Disciplinary Subjects[J].Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences),2010,24(4):124-130.
Authors:WANG Yi-fei
Institution:WAMG Yi-fei(School of Law,Beijing University,Beijing 100871,China)
Abstract:In both the common law countries and civil law countries,judge disciplinary subjects generally include the judicial misconducts and non-judicial misconducts.While in Chinese judicial practice,besides the before-mentioned two kinds of acts,"responsibility for misjudged cases" and "performance evaluation" are also included.In order to improve China's current judge disciplinary system,efforts should be made from following aspects,such as gradually expanding the scope of the judicial misconducts,setting up prohibited areas for punishment,and eliminating the negative impacts of performance evaluation and the system of affixing responsibility for misjudged cases on the judges,etc.So the transformation from "act and result-centered"punitive approach to"act-centered" punitive approach can be achieved.
Keywords:misconduct  "act-centered" punitive approach  responsibility for misjudged case  performance evaluation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号