| 刑法解释限度理论“关联概念”新辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龚振军.刑法解释限度理论“关联概念”新辨析[J].浙江社会科学,2011(9). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龚振军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学法政学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 浙江师范大学博士科研项目“我国法治视野下刑法解释限度研究”(ZC304010075);浙江师范大学人文社科类项目“风险社会下刑法解释限度研究”(KYJ06Y10028) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法学界并没有认真对待刑法解释限度之理论问题。对于刑法解释限度理论中关联概念的探讨和运用还仅仅停留在抽象性、模糊性的权利话语或道德话语层面,这在很大程度上消减了对刑法解释限度的论证力和合理性,同时也是导致刑法解释限度理论混乱的根本原因。鉴于此,为了深入地厘清解释限度不同理论之关系,有必要对解释限度理论之关联概念进行本源意义上之探究。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法解释限度 国民预测可能性 法文语义 犯罪定型 |
On the Relational Concept of the Limit of Criminal Law Interpretation Theory |
| |
| Gong Zhenjun.On the Relational Concept of the Limit of Criminal Law Interpretation Theory[J].Zhejiang Social Sciences,2011(9). |
| |
| Authors: | Gong Zhenjun |
| |
| Institution: | Gong Zhenjun(College of Law and Political Science,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004) |
| |
| Abstract: | Criminal law scholars do not take seriously the limit of criminal law interpretation theory.The discussions and applications of the relational concept within the limits of criminal law interpretation theory are still kept abstract and at the level of ambiguous right of discourse or moral discourse,which largely reduces the force and legitimacy of the limit of criminal law interpretation and also brings theoretical confusion to it.In view of this,in order to thoroughly clarify the relationship among the diff... |
| |
| Keywords: | Limit of Criminal Law Interpretation Possibility of National Forecasting Norm Meaning Crime Finalization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
