| 不安抗辩权之比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李海鹰.不安抗辩权之比较研究[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,20(2):104-108. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李海鹰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东理工大学法律系,上海,200237 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 不安抗辩权是我国合同法规定的一项新的制度,其目的是维护交易秩序,保障交易安全,对该项法律制度本身以及与其相关的理论进行深入的比较研究,对正确贯彻和运用不安抗辩权有着积极的意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 抗辩权 不安抗辩权 比较研究 双务合同 预期违约 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7672(2005)02-0104-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年3月21日 |
Comparative Research of Right That Contradicts Uneasily |
| |
| LI Hai-ying.Comparative Research of Right That Contradicts Uneasily[J].Journal of East China University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition,2005,20(2):104-108. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Hai-ying |
| |
| Institution: | LI Hai-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Right that contradicts uneasily, as a new institution in contract law, is designed to maintain the order and the safety of transaction. It is significant to carry out a comparative research on this institution as well as other theories that are concerned. As a result, we will have a better understanding about it and apply it correctly in the legal practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | Right that contradicts right that contradicts uneasily comparative research bilateral contract anticipatory repudiation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
