首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论亲权的私权属性——对权利义务统一说的驳斥
引用本文:巩姗姗.论亲权的私权属性——对权利义务统一说的驳斥[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2010(3):59-64.
作者姓名:巩姗姗
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:通常认为亲权性质为权利义务的统一体。通说违反了权利和义务范畴的基本关系,直接违背亲权的私权属性。亲权的私权属性是由亲权产生发展的历史和对抗专制政权的现实共同决定。亲权是父母特有的民事权利,客体为父母对后代的自然情感利益。滥用亲权会引起相关公法后果,表现为父母须对国家和社会承担一定责任,责任性质不是民事责任,责任本身也不改变亲权私权属性。

关 键 词:亲权  私权属性  情感利益  权利义务统一说

On Parental Authority's Nature of Private Right:Criticism on the Unity of Right and Obligation Theory
GONG Shan-shan.On Parental Authority's Nature of Private Right:Criticism on the Unity of Right and Obligation Theory[J].Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences),2010(3):59-64.
Authors:GONG Shan-shan
Institution:GONG Shan-shan (Law School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
Abstract:The general view is that the nature of parental authority is the unity which is a combination of series rights and obligations.The view violates the logical relationship between right and obligation,and directly runs counter the private nature which determined by the history of parental authority and the reality of fighting against the authoritarian regime.Parental authority is the specific civil right belonging to parents,and points out the object of parents' natural emotional interests on future generation.Abuse of parental authority would cause the relevant public legal consequences,and parents should bear some national and social responsibility which is not the civil liability at all.Meanwhile,the public legal consequences will not affect the private nature.
Keywords:parental authority  nature of private right  emotional interests  unity of right and obligation theory
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号