River basin planning as a strategy for rural development in Nigeria |
| |
Authors: | A.T. Salau |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom;2. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands;3. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;1. Geotomo Software, 115 Cangkat Minden Jalan 5, Minden Heights, Gelugor 11700, Penang, Malaysia;2. British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom;3. British Geological Survey, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | River basin planning has existed in one form or another since the third millenium B.C. when some of the earliest civilizations evolved in the great drainage basins of Mesopotamia, Egypt and north-west India. It has, however, undergone several modifications before finally culminating in the comprehensive planning for simultaneous development of all resources of a river basin.The idea of river basin planning was first mooted in Nigeria by the Food and Agriculture Organization in the late 1960s. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Federal government of Nigeria also came to the belief that river basin planning could play a significant role in the country's development. At the height of the ‘oil boom’ in 1976 and with the incipient manifestation of structural problems in the national economy, the government took a giant step in river basin planning by the establishment of 11 river basin development authorities. River basin planning is viewed as a ‘new approach’ to rural development and has involved more substantial capital outlay than all the other rural programmes combined.This paper examines the implementation and impact of these projects, which are large-scale and capital intensive, and which may be incompatible with a strategy aimed at improving the lot of the peasant farmers. The projects have wrought havoc on the prevailing rural economy and social-economic structures. Even if they were to achieve the primary objective of increasing rural productivity, this may be at a great cost to the rural populace and the environment.Perhaps more important is that river basin planning has the potential of substituting one form of dependency for another (food importation being substituted for the importation of fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, equipment, machines and foreign experts). The projects are thus benefiting a powerful combination of interests comprising local and foreign contractors, land speculators, bureaucrats, rural elites and incipient capitalist farmers who have not borne any losses in the process of implementation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|