首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

民法上的抗辩与抗辩权
引用本文:柳经纬,尹腊梅. 民法上的抗辩与抗辩权[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 0(2): 89-96
作者姓名:柳经纬  尹腊梅
作者单位:1. 中国政法大学,比较法研究所,北京,100000
2. 厦门大学,法学院,福建,厦门,361005
摘    要:民法上的抗辩与抗辩权是一对极易被混用的概念。然而,二者在效力、行使方式等方面均存在重大差别。抗辩与抗辩权的划分直接影响法官在诉讼过程中所能援引的事实范围,还决定着义务人在业已履行之后是否可以请求返还,最终体现立法者的价值判断。作为请求权的对立面,抗辩权在构建私法自治空间方面具有重要地位。

关 键 词:抗辩  抗辩权  私法自治
文章编号:0438-0460(2007)02-0089-08
修稿时间:2006-10-05

Defence and Right of Defence in Civil Law
LIU Jing-wei,YIN La-mei. Defence and Right of Defence in Civil Law[J]. Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences), 2007, 0(2): 89-96
Authors:LIU Jing-wei  YIN La-mei
Abstract:The concepts of Defense and Right of Defense in civil law are easily confused.They differ from each other in effects and modes of exertion,etc.The distinction between them directly affects defining the scope of facts to be invoked by the judge,and determines whether the performance carried out by the obligor can be claimed back.In a word,it embodies the value judgments of legislators.As the opposite of Claim,the Right of Defense is of great importance to the establishment of autonomy of private law.
Keywords:defense  right of defense  autonomy of private law
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号