民族区域自治法与其他法律规定的冲突问题研究

《民族区域自治法》中的准用性规则存在两个方面问题：一是一些法律条文援引的法律对相关问题虽然作出了明确规定,但与《宪法》第115条和《民族区域自治法》第4条规定的“使自治机关有大于一般地方的自主权”的原则存在冲突,致使自治机关的自治权失去了相关法律的支持和保障。二是一些法律条文援引的法律或其他国家规定并没有对相关问题作出明确规定,使得有关国家机关的职责履行缺乏有效的规则约束。为此,应对《民族区域自治法》中的准用性规则进行修改,明确指出所援引的法律或其他规定的具体名称或内容,为立法者提供一个比较明确的指引,以更好地维护法制的统一。同时,应对《土地管理法》《矿产资源法》等法律法规中存在的与《民族区域自治法》相冲突的法律规定进行修改,以切实保障自治机关在自然资源开发、金融管理和税收减免等方面的自治权。

A Study on Conflicts between the Law onRegional Ethnic Autonomy and Other Laws

There are two problems in the applicable rules of the Law on Regional Ethnic Autonomy: One is that someof the laws cited in some of the articles clearly define the relevant issues. However, in conflict with the principle of"giving autonomous administrations greater autonomy than the autonomy of the general areas" as provided for inarticle 115 of the constitution and article 4 of the law on regional national autonomy. As a result, the autonomy ofautonomous administrations has lost the support and guarantee of relevant laws. Second, some laws or other nationalregulations quoted in some legal provisions do not clearly stipulate relevant issues. Therefore, there are no effectiverules and regulations on the performance of the functions and responsibilities of relevant state organs. In response tothe Law on Regional Ethnic Autonomy, it shall apply mutatis mutandis to modify the rule of appropriateness, makeclear that the quoted as saying by the law or other specific name or content, to provide a more clear direction forlawmakers, to better safeguard the unity of the law. At the same time, the response to the conflicts of the LandManagement Law, Mineral Resources Law and other laws and regulations with the law on regional national autonomylaw, it should be modified to ensure the autonomy of the administrations of autonomous governments in thedevelopment of natural resources, financial management and tax relief