首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国讯问前权利告知的完善
引用本文:林国强,;周菲菲.论我国讯问前权利告知的完善[J].洛阳工学院学报(社会科学版),2014(6):94-98.
作者姓名:林国强  ;周菲菲
作者单位:[1]河南科技大学法学院,河南洛阳471023; [2]漯河市委党校法学室,河南漯河462000
摘    要:在法治国家(地区),沉默权和律师帮助权是讯问前最主要的告知内容,如果侦查机关未告知这些权利,则所获供述有可能落入非法供述排除的范围。在讯问前未告知权利与非法供述排除规则的关系上,法治国家(地区)形成了原则加例外模式和裁量排除模式。我国《刑事诉讼法》虽有讯问前告知权利的规定,但告知内容单薄,且未确立程序违法所获供述排除规则。作为理想的改革措施,我国应借鉴法治国家(地区)有关讯问前权利告知制度,建立完整的讯问前权利告知规则;通过对现行立法和司法解释相关规定的进一步挖掘,也可以在不突破现行法律框架的情况下一定程度上弥补我国讯问前权利告知规则的缺陷。

关 键 词:讯问  权利告知  非法供述排除

Perfection of Right Notification Before Interrogation in China
Institution:LIN Guo-qiang, ZHOU Fei-fei ( School of Law , Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China ; Law Department, Party School of Luohe Municipal Committee, Luohe 462000, China)
Abstract:In countries under the rule of law, the most important informed contents are the right to silence and right to counsel before interrogation. If the investigation organizations don't inform these rights, the confessions would be exclusion. As to relation between failure of right notification and illegal-obtained confession exclusion, there have two models of the principle plus exception and discretion. There do have rules about right notification before interrogation in China' s Law of Criminal Procedure, but it shows few informed contents and lack of the rule about confession exclusion through illegal procedure. As the ideal reform measures, it is suggested to the system of right notification from other countries under the rule of law to perfect regulations of right to counsel before interrogation. By further study the current legislation and judicial interpretation, the defects of right notification before interrogation can be remedied to a certain extent through exploiting the relevant provisions of existing legal framework.
Keywords:interrogation  right notification  illegal-obtained confession exclusion
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号