| 伯尔曼式“法律信仰”的实质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋忠好. 伯尔曼式“法律信仰”的实质[J]. 河南工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 5(4): 63-66,71 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋忠好 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 淮海工学院法学院,江苏连云港,222005 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 淮海工学院人文社会科学研究项月 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 伯尔曼的“法律必须被信仰，否则它将形同虚设”这一命题近年来在中国法学界引起了极大的争议，争议的焦点在于对“法律”和“信仰”概念的不同理解。伯尔曼基于对20世纪美国社会现实的分析，认为法律与宗教荣辱与共，法律不仅是一种规范，还体现了人的正义终极的关切。伯尔曼是基于西方现代本体论的视角，提出“法律必须被信仰”这一命题的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宗教 法律信仰 实质 本体论 |
THE QUIDDITY OF BARMAN'S "BELIEF IN LAW" |
| |
| SONG Zhong-hao. THE QUIDDITY OF BARMAN'S "BELIEF IN LAW"[J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2009, 5(4): 63-66,71 |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Zhong-hao |
| |
| Affiliation: | SONG Zhong-hao ( School of Law, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Lianyungang 222005, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Barman＇ s proposition of ＂belief in law＂ has caused a maximal disputation among the law academies. The dispute＇ s focus lies in a different understanding of the concepts of ＂law＂ and ＂belief＂. Based on an analysis of American social reality in the 20th century, Barman believes that the law is not only a legal norm but also reflects the final concern for man＇ s justice in that the law and religion share honor or disgrace. He puts forward this proposition ＂Law has to be believe in, or it will not work＂ based on contemporary western ontology. |
| |
| Keywords: | religion belief in law quiddity ontology |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
