首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Candidate Evaluations by Men and Women
Authors:SHABAD  GOLDIE; ANDERSEN  KRISTI
Institution:Asssociate Director of the Polimetrics Laboratory, Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University. The data analyzed in this paper were originally collected by the Center for Political Studies, University of Michigian, and were available by the Inter-University Consortium for Social and Political Research. Computer time was provided by the Department of Political Science and data were analyzed through the Instruction and Research Computer Center, the Ohio Stata University. We are grateful to Debbie Gross-Sidlow, Connacht Cash, and Lawrence Conin for their assistance in this research, and to Stuart J. Thorson and Herbert B. Asher for their comments on the paper.
Abstract:A widely accepted generalization in the social science literatureis that women tend to personalize politics and politicians.The purpose of this article is twofold. The first is to determinewhether an analysis of the available U.S. survey data from 1952to 1976 tends to support the claims made about how women differfrom men in their assessments of politicians. The second isto suggest alternative and more precise ways of conceptualizingboth men's and women's responsesto and evaluation of politicalleaders.
Keywords:
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号