首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国文明与国家探源的思考
引用本文:陈淳. 中国文明与国家探源的思考[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2002, 0(1): 45-52
作者姓名:陈淳
作者单位:复旦大学,文物与博物馆学系,上海,200433
基金项目:本课题研究得到复旦大学三年行动计划文科科研项目支持,项目批准号:00GHZCD011.
摘    要:通过中西学术传统背景和当前研究现状的比较 ,文明与国家探源研究的传统与目标、文明与早期国家的科学定义、理论阐释和科学通则研究的意义的讨论 ,以及考古学研究的最新进展状况 ,可以得出 ,中国的文明与国家探源必须跳出历史编年学的窠臼 ,消除“国情不同”的成见。考古记录和文献是不同的研究材料 ,不应将考古发现印证史籍记载看作是研究的最大成果。我们要从科学观念上做根本的改变 ,从人类社会发展的整体框架来研究中国文明和国家起源的独特轨迹

关 键 词:文明与国家探源  理论与方法  传统与现状  历史的思考
文章编号:0257-0289(2002)01-0045-008
修稿时间:2001-06-20

Reflections on the Studies of the Origin of Civilization and States in China
Chen Chun. Reflections on the Studies of the Origin of Civilization and States in China[J]. Fudan Journal(Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 0(1): 45-52
Authors:Chen Chun
Abstract:On the basis of a comparison of traditional backgrounds and current studies between Chinese and Western schools,this article makes an overall review of the tradition and purpose of the studies of the origin of civiliztion and early states,discusses the definitions of civilization and early states,highlights the significance of theoretical interpretation and the study of general laws, and introduces the new progresses in archaeological research.The article argues that Chinese study of the origin of civilization and early states must break away from historiographical orientation and the prejudice of "national uniqueness".Archaeological records and historic texts are different data.Academic achievements should not be based on the position that archaeological discoveries have to prove the traditional texts.We have to make a fundamental change in scientific perspective and put the study of the origin of Chinese civilization and early states in the global framework of social and cultural evolution.
Keywords:origin of civilization and states  theory and method  tradition and Present condition  historical review  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号