首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

李欧梵的中国现代文学研究及其文学史意义
引用本文:康小霞. 李欧梵的中国现代文学研究及其文学史意义[J]. 湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009, 29(6): 52-55
作者姓名:康小霞
作者单位:华中师范大学,文学院,,湖北,武汉,430079
摘    要:李欧梵发掘“颓废”的现代美学和文化意义,建构起“颓废”文学史,审视中国现代文学的现代性。这可视为80、90年代重写文学史热潮下的“现代性”研究的重要一元,促成了文学史研究范式由社会政治研究范式向文化现代化研究范式转换,其中所折射出来的文学史研究的立场和标准问题,在当下学者对“重写文学史”予以重新审视的思潮下,值得我们思考。

关 键 词:颓废  现代性  范式  转换

Leo Ou-fan Lee's study of Chinese modern literature and the significance in literary history
KANG Xiao-xia. Leo Ou-fan Lee's study of Chinese modern literature and the significance in literary history[J]. Journal of Hubei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2009, 29(6): 52-55
Authors:KANG Xiao-xia
Affiliation:KANG Xiao-xia (College of Literature, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
Abstract:In Leo Ou -fan Lee's study of Chinese modern literature , he excavate the modem aesthetics and cultural significance of "decadence". He take "dispirited" as the core esthetic consciousness's literature phenomenon series, with organize, constructs the history of "dispiritedly" literature, and from these to excavates the modernity in Chinese modem literature . Leo Ou - fan Lee's research viewpoint may regard as a important point of the "Rewriting Literary History" under the wave of "modernity" research in 80 - 90ths. Contributed to the literary study of the history of research paradigm by the social and political modernization paradigm to the paradigm of cultural conversion, the question of standpoint and the standard which refract in this paradigm transforms of" Rewriting Literary History" ,with in the current scholars of to re -examine the ideas, is worth us to thinking about.
Keywords:decadence  modernity  paradigm  transformation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号