| 古文论语体嬗变之我见——与李小兰博士商榷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓心强.古文论语体嬗变之我见——与李小兰博士商榷[J].学术界,2010(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓心强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学文学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文章结合李小兰博士的研究,对古文论语体嬗变规律提出了一些自己的看法.并就所存分歧进行初步的商榷与交流.作者认同李小兰"隐秀同体"的概括,而对"韵散相递"则存有异议.文章依次从各类传统批评文体在宋以后得到了承传与融汇,文人骈体写作技能的内化与不自觉化等方面展开商榷,提出了新的古文论嬗变规律.同时就原作者"韵散相递"概括的原因和不足进行了学术反思.
|
| 关 键 词： | 批评文体 语体 嬗变 商榷 二元思维 |
My Views on the Transmutation of Type of Writing of Classical Chinese——Discussing with Dr. Li Xiaolan |
| |
| Deng Xinqiang.My Views on the Transmutation of Type of Writing of Classical Chinese——Discussing with Dr. Li Xiaolan[J].Academics in China,2010(1). |
| |
| Authors: | Deng Xinqiang |
| |
| Abstract: | In combination with the studies of Dr. Li Xiaolan, the author of the article has put forward some of his own views on the laws of the transmutation of type of writing of classical Chinese and conducted some preliminary discussions and exchanges with regard to the existing differences. The author agrees with the generalization of the in tegrity betweenwhat is hidden elegance and what is elegance , but disagrees with verse and prose succeeding each other. In this article the author has discussed in turn such ... |
| |
| Keywords: | critical genre type of writing transmutation discussion binary thinking |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
