首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

德国证据禁止理论对中国的启示
引用本文:李倩.德国证据禁止理论对中国的启示[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,11(1):51-55.
作者姓名:李倩
作者单位:北京大学,法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:近代以来,国内学者一直探讨美国的“毒树之果”理论,讨论我国是否应该建立非法证据的排除规则。在近代的联邦德国,也有证据排除理论,名为“证据禁止”理论,它与美国的毒树之果理论相比,更加注重在司法实践中的应用。探讨联邦德国禁止使用的证据是否有“远距离的影响”,即德国的“毒树之果”是否应当排除其证明力,以期找到该理论对中国的启示。

关 键 词:证据禁止  禁止使用的证据  毒树之果
文章编号:1008-889X(2008)01-51-05
修稿时间:2007年8月15日

Evidence Prohibition Theory in Germany and Its Enlightenment for China
LI Qian.Evidence Prohibition Theory in Germany and Its Enlightenment for China[J].Journal of Jimei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),2008,11(1):51-55.
Authors:LI Qian
Institution:LI Qian (Law College, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
Abstract:Since the modern time,China's scholars have been exploring the "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" theory in the United States.They discuss whether China should set an exclusionary rule of illegally gained evidence.In modern Germany,there is a similar theory named "evidence prohibition".It puts more emphasis on its application in judiciary practice,compared with its counterpart in the US.This paper illustrates whether the forbidden evidence in Germany has a long-range effect,i.e.,whether this "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" should have a provable ability,attempting to provide an enlightenment for China.
Keywords:evidence prohibition  evidence prohibited to be used  Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号