Beyond deference and demystification in the sociology of science and technology: A reply to Otero |
| |
Authors: | Frederick H. Buttel |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Rural Sociology and Program on Science, Technology and Society, Cornell University, 14853-7801 Ithaca, New York |
| |
Abstract: | A response to Otero's criticism of the thesis of the nonrevolutionary character of biotechnology is developed within a larger consideration of the relatively small amount of attention high technologies have received within the sociology of science. It is argued that the new sociology of science of the past decade has been a major advance on midcentury functionalist perspectives that took an essentialist, deferential view toward science. The new sociology of science, based on the demystification of science through a relativist view of scientific knowledge production, is nonetheless limited in several respects in its applicability to contemporary issues relating to high technologies. Otero's criticisms are considered in the light of the continuing need for uniting the sociology of science and sociology of technology, and for developing a perspective on science and technology that avoids both uncritical deference and excessive relativization of these forces for social change. |
| |
Keywords: | biotechnology high technology sociology of science sociology of technology new international division of labor |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|