首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

历史与苦难的缺席--对形式主义文论纯技术主义倾向的反思
引用本文:黄斐. 历史与苦难的缺席--对形式主义文论纯技术主义倾向的反思[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 4(3): 68-71
作者姓名:黄斐
作者单位:深圳大学,文学院,深圳,518060
摘    要:形式主义是以反叛者的面目出现在文论史上的,它们所要反对的是实证主义在文学研究中的中心地位,但客观地说形式主义仍然未能摆脱现代实证主义和技术主义的窠臼,只不过它们把实证主义和技术主义的落脚点放在了文学作品的形式之上.因而,不可避免地对历史和苦难则采取了回避的态度.本文拟从形式主义文论影响下的中国当代文学为出发点来探讨形式主义文论的缺憾之处,并针对中国文学提出价值重铸的问题.

关 键 词:形式主义文论  纯技术主义  历史与苦难  缺席  价值重铸
文章编号:1671-7287(2005)03-0068-04
修稿时间:2005-03-24

The Absence of History and Misery: Reflections on Formalism's Technical Tendency in Literary Criticism
Huang Fei. The Absence of History and Misery: Reflections on Formalism's Technical Tendency in Literary Criticism[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2005, 4(3): 68-71
Authors:Huang Fei
Abstract:Formalism came into the history of literary study by revolting against the standing of positivism.As a matter of fact,formalism is not able to break away from the patterns of positivism and technicism.Formalists only emphasize their literary criticism on the form of literary works.Therefore,they inevitably try to evade the aspects of history and misery.This article discusses the weak points of formalism's literary criticism through the analysis of contemporary Chinese literature.Based on that,the article also asks for the revaluation of Chinese literature.
Keywords:formalism  literary criticism  pure technicism  history and misery  absence  revaluation  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号