《共产党宣言》的文学性确证

《共产党宣言》语言丰饶、言语深邃,喜用铺排、反问、比喻等修辞手法,并将其放置于阶级对立体系中完成修辞的言说功能,呈现出鲜明的文学现象,但其文学性评判历来缺失。《共产党宣言》的文学性信度须从文本生成、多语种比照和翻译史演进等层面加以确证。由于叙事需要,从《共产主义信条草案》到《共产主义原理》再到《共产党宣言》,是带有教义特征的文本进行科学化、再进行文艺化的过程。从中、英、德文比较看,《共产党宣言》中译本不存在符合汉语言审美的文学化改造,从而疏离德文原文语言质地的现象。从汉译史看,《共产党宣言》精准地反映了原著的思想精髓和语言风格。足见,《共产党宣言》的文学性是可确证的。

Literary Confirmation of The Communist Manifesto

The Communist Manifesto is rich in language and deep in speech. It likes to use rhetorical devices such as parallelism, rhetorical questions, metaphor, etc., and to put them in the class to oppose system to complete the rhetorical function, showing a distinct literary phenomenon, but its literary evaluation has always been missing. The literary reliability of The Communist Manifesto should be confirmed from the aspects of text generation, multilingual comparison and the evolution of translation history. It is a process of scientific and literary texts with doctrinal characteristics from the Draft of the Communist Creed to the Principles of Communism and then to The Communist Manifesto because of the need of narration. From the comparison of Chinese, English and German, the Chinese version of The Communist Manifesto does not have a literary transformation with the Chinese language aesthetics, thus alienating the language quality of the original German. From the perspective of Chinese translation history, The Communist Manifesto accurately reflects the ideological essence and language style of the original work.It can be seen that the literariness of The Communist Manifesto is verifiable.