首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Generalizing from PRSA to public relations: How to accommodate sampling bias in public relations scholarship
Authors:Vincent Hazleton  Bey-Ling Sha
Institution:1. Radford University, United States;2. San Diego State University, United States
Abstract:One of the major challenges to conducting externally valid, quantitative scholarship in public relations is accessing samples of practitioners that are willing to participate in academic research. One sampling frame would naturally be the membership of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA), which is the world's largest professional association for public relations practitioners. Yet, even if the question of access were resolved, there still remains the question of external validity, i.e., the issue of whether and to what extent the membership of PRSA (or any other sampling frame) reflects the population of public relations practitioners in general.
Keywords:Sampling  Population study  External validity  Public Relations Society of America  PRSA  Research validity  Sampling bias  Gender  Diversity  Race  Geography  Accreditation  APR
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号