首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

非法证据排除规则比较评析
引用本文:王于红. 非法证据排除规则比较评析[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 9(2): 23-26
作者姓名:王于红
作者单位:安徽理工大学经济管理与社会科学系,安徽,淮南,232001
摘    要:建立非法证据排除规则不仅是保障人权、维护法制尊严的需要,而且也是促进案件实体真实发现的需要。我国相关立法和司法解释虽然对非法证据的排除作了一些规定,但其存在的缺陷是明显的。通过对两大法系非法证据排除规则历史发展的考察,提出了设立适宜我国国情的、平衡保障人权和惩罚犯罪双重需要的非法证据排除规则。

关 键 词:非法证据排除规则  比较  评析
文章编号:1672-1101(2007)02-0023-04
修稿时间:2007-05-21

Comparison and appraisal of the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence
WANG Yu-Hong. Comparison and appraisal of the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science, 2007, 9(2): 23-26
Authors:WANG Yu-Hong
Affiliation:Dept. of Economic Management and Social Sciences, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan. Anhui 232001 ,China
Abstract:Setting up the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China does not only meet the needs of human rights and of the maintenance of the dignity of legal system,but also promotes the detection of the entity of law cases.Although relevant legislations and judicial interpretation have made some rules about the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China,its defects are evident.The paper,after reviewing the historical development of the two legal systems of exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence,proposes setting up the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence in China which suits our national condition and the dual needs which balance the protection of human rights and the punishment of crimes.
Keywords:the exclusionary rule of illegally-obtained evidence  comparison  appraisal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号