首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法中的不信任与协调——丹麦陪审制剖析
引用本文:吴军辉.司法中的不信任与协调——丹麦陪审制剖析[J].聊城大学学报(社会科学版),2012(3):69-73.
作者姓名:吴军辉
作者单位:中共广东省委党校法学教研部,广东广州,510053
摘    要:在陪审制发展过程中总是伴随着对职业法官司法的批评以及对普通大众司法的批评,这种对立意见表现的是对两种司法模式中执掌权力之人的不信任。为协调这种冲突,丹麦在有利于发挥陪审制的作用、有利于保障被告人的合法权益的原则之下既保留陪审团制、又实施参审制,发展出独具特色的陪审制模式。

关 键 词:司法  不信任  丹麦陪审制

Mistrust and Mediation in Judiciary -Analysis of Danish Jury System
WU Jun-hui.Mistrust and Mediation in Judiciary -Analysis of Danish Jury System[J].Journal of Liancheng University:Social Sciences Edition,2012(3):69-73.
Authors:WU Jun-hui
Institution:WU Jun-hui(Teaching and Research Section of Law,Party School of Guangdong Committee of CPC,Guangzhou 510053,China)
Abstract:Development of jury system has always been accompanied with criticism of justice by professional judges and criticism of justice by ordinary mass.Such opposed positions reflect mistrust of those in control of power in the aforesaid two modes of justice.In order to mediate the conflict,Denmark has developed a unique jury system which keeps jury trial while applying mixed court system under the principle that legitimate interest of defendant should be protected and jury system should play an active role
Keywords:Justice  mistrust  Danish jury system
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号