| 关联理论与会话含意学说的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 旷战.关联理论与会话含意学说的比较[J].长春工程学院学报(社会科学版),2006,7(4):56-58. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 旷战 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南科技大学,外国语学院,湘潭,411100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Sperber和W ilson的关联理论试图从人的认知特点和过程来揭示交际的规律,而格莱斯首先提出的会话含意理论则引发了有关语用推理和对自然语言的研究。理解这两个理论的基本框架,探讨关联理论与会话含意理论之差异,对于解释跨文化交际中出现的语用失误与交际失败现象,最终取得成功的交际有着十分重要的意义。本文试图围绕这两种学说的基本理论框架,在理论来源,推理模式,明说和暗含,语境四个方面讨论其差异,指出两种理论的不足之处。
|
| 关 键 词： | 关联理论 会话含意 合作原则 语境 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-8976(2006)04-0056-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年10月10日 |
Comparison between the principle of relevance and conversational implicature |
| |
| KUANG Zhan.Comparison between the principle of relevance and conversational implicature[J].Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition),2006,7(4):56-58. |
| |
| Authors: | KUANG Zhan |
| |
| Abstract: | The Principle of Relevance of Sperber and Wilson tries to discover the laws of communication according to human's cognitive features.American linguists and philosopher H.P Grice created Conversational Implicature.For successful cross-cultural communication and explanation of pragmatic misuse and communication failure,it is very useful to understand and master the basic opinions of the two theories.In this thesis we will discuss the basic opinions of the two theories and find their differences in relevance and cooperative principle,explicature and implicature,inferential models and contexts.Finally,we'll discuss their shortcomings and defaults. |
| |
| Keywords: | principle of relevance conversational implicature cooperative principle context |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
