首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论恶意转发网络虚假信息的司法认定
引用本文:陈伟,霍俊阁. 论恶意转发网络虚假信息的司法认定[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 23(5): 103-113. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2017.05.011
作者姓名:陈伟  霍俊阁
作者单位:西南政法大学 法学院,重庆,401120
基金项目:2016年重庆市社会科学规划一般项目"安全焦虑视角下刑法前置化研究"(2016YBFX097);重庆市教委人文社会科学重点项目"刑法修订中的政策导向与前置化倾向研究——以9个刑法修正案为素材的清理与反思"(16SKGH001)
摘    要:刑法在治理网络虚假信息时,过多注重打击直接发布行为,却懈怠了对恶意转发行为的治理.而此种懈怠与治理虚假信息的初衷背道而驰,因为恶意转发网络虚假信息的规范本质,即是故意发布网络虚假信息.实践中之所以放松对恶意转发行为的打击,是因为"恶意转发"缺乏明确的认定标准.化解这一难题,应以转发内容、转发动机为要素,推定行为人是否存在"恶意".同时,以唯一关联标准和反证规则来限制推定,以实现司法认定的正义性要求.

关 键 词:虚假信息  恶意的本质  恶意的要素  刑事推定  反证规则
收稿时间:2017-05-02

Judicial determination of malicious forwarding cyber false information
CHEN Wei and HUO Junge. Judicial determination of malicious forwarding cyber false information[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 23(5): 103-113. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2017.05.011
Authors:CHEN Wei and HUO Junge
Affiliation:School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, P. R. China and School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, P. R. China
Abstract:When Criminal Law manages cyber false information, too much is focused on combating direct publishing behaviors, but slacking off in the management of malicious forwarding behaviors. And such slacking is contrary to the original intention of dealing with false information, because the nature of cyber malicious information forwarding is deliberately publishing cyber false information. The loosening of attacking on malicious forwarding behaviors reasons in the lack of clear standards for the identification of "malicious forwarding". To solve this problem, we should consider the content forwarded and the motive of the forwarding behavior as factors, to presume whether the perpetrators are "malicious". At the same time, in order to achieve the justice of judicial determination, we should use the only association standard and anti-evidence rule to limit the presumption.
Keywords:false information  malicious nature  malicious element  criminal presumption  anti-evidence rule
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号