20世纪30年代“大众化”论争中的两种立场及意义

在20世纪30年代的"大众化"讨论中大致有两种倾向,一种倾向是以瞿秋白和创造社、太阳社成员为代表,另一种倾向是以鲁迅、茅盾为代表,这两种倾向之间的分歧,并非仅仅是认识上的差异,其实有一个立场的不同。前者把"大众化"仅仅看做推行、建立无产阶级文学的手段,因此显示出偏执和狂热;后者则坚持了五四新文学传统,因此显示出理智与冷静。鲁迅和茅盾的介入更像一味镇静剂和清醒剂,在"左翼"文学内部有力地遏制了过分"左"倾化的倾向,把论争拉回到更现实的层面上,增加了建设性,减少了破坏性。

Two Viewpoints and Their Significance in the Argument of Popularization in 1930s

In the argument of popularization in 1930s,the difference between Qu Qiu-bai,Creative Society,and Sun Society and Lu Xun and Mao Dun is not just the difference in the understanding.Actually,it also involves the difference in the standpoint.The former just take it as the means to advocate and establish the proletarian literature,so it has the feature of extreme and fever.While the latter insist on the new literature tradition of May 4th and manifests the feature of reason and calmness.As the medicine of tranquillizer,Lu Xun and Mao Dun's involvement greatly restrains the tendency of over-left in the Left-wing Literature League.In other word,it is constructive,but not destructive.