| 科斯定理与异地"排污权"交易案 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张玉棉,田大增.科斯定理与异地"排污权"交易案[J].河北学刊,2005,25(6):197-199. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张玉棉 田大增 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河北大学,经济学院环境研究中心,河北,保定,071002;河北大学,物理系,河北,保定,071002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国首例关于"排污权"交易的案例,看似符合经济学有名的"科斯第一定理",即在产权界定后,无论产权归谁所有,均可达到资源的最优配置,实则并非如此."排污权交易案"严重违反了"科斯定理"的前提假定,是一种不正当的交易.在提倡科学发展观的今天,应严令禁止此类事件的发生.
|
| 关 键 词： | 排污权 科斯定理 资源有效配置 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-7071(2005)06-0197-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年8月26日 |
The subject of thesis: the deviation of "pollution right" dealing case and scientific development views |
| |
| ZHANG Yu-mian,TAN Da-Zeng.The subject of thesis: the deviation of "pollution right" dealing case and scientific development views[J].Hebei Academic Journal,2005,25(6):197-199. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Yu-mian TAN Da-Zeng |
| |
| Abstract: | It seems to be true that the first "pollution right" deal case in china is according with the famous "Coase Theory" , however it is not actual. "Coase Theory" explains that after boundary the propery right, whoever get it, the resource ordonnance can be optimized. The " pollution right" deal case strictly against the assumption of "Coase Theory" , so get the ludicrous deal. In morden society where "scientific development views" is advocated, we should strictly forbid this kind of things happening again. |
| |
| Keywords: | pollution right Coase Theory the efficient ordannance of resources |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
