宪法财产权主体论

宪法上的财产权是社会中自治的人所享有的人权,并非法律上一切人格体瓜分和控制经济价值的形式.不应概括地把承载公共使命的法律人格视为宪法上的财产权主体.政府享有作为公共权力的财政收支权,而不是作为人权的财产权.意志相对独立的国有企事业可以被界定为宪法上的财产权主体,但只应在一定范围内追求和享有财富.把握不同主体之间的差异,是科学理解宪法上的财产权的基础,也是转变政府职能,深化改革和促进非公有制经济发展的前提.

On the Right Holder of Constitutional Property Rights

Constitutional property rights should be regarded as human rights rather than a channel to control economic value. The right holder of constitutional property rights is not identical to that of property rights in civil law. It is not proper to treat all legal entities committed to public ends as right holders of constitutional property rights. Governments enjoy and exert fiscal powers but should not act as a right holder of constitutional property rights. State-owned enterprises may be treated as right holders of constitutional property rights, yet their activities should be restricted to limited areas.