| 尼采的"上帝之死"与福柯的"人之死" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李鲁祥,李晓林.尼采的"上帝之死"与福柯的"人之死"[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2003,31(4):48-53. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李鲁祥 李晓林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 枣庄师范专科学校,中文系,山东,枣庄,277160
2. 厦门大学,中文系,福建,厦门,361005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 尼采的"上帝死了"指的是人要独立于世界,必须否定那个设定了终极价值和意义的上帝;福柯 的"人死了"指的是随着语言回归自身,18世纪末、19世纪初出现于西方哲学中的"人"的概念将失去意义.在尼采的"上帝之死"与福柯的"人之死"之间有着血缘关系"上帝"和"人"都是人的发明,人借此确立了自身的特权地位;在解构了"上帝"和"人"之后,审美成为人生最重要、最本真的事情.
|
| 关 键 词： | 上帝之死 人之死 审美主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-2804(2003)04-0048-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年4月3日 |
The Death of God and the Death of Man: A Comparative Study of Nietzsche and Foucault |
| |
| LI Lu-xiang LI Xiao-lin.The Death of God and the Death of Man: A Comparative Study of Nietzsche and Foucault[J].Journal of Lanzhor University(Social Sciences),2003,31(4):48-53. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Lu-xiang LI Xiao-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | Friedrich Nietzsche's claim that God is dead is a proclamation that the spiritual independence of man entails the complete denial of the preexisted ultimate law as embodied in God while Michel Foucault's claim that man is dead means that the concept of man that was developed in Western philosophy in the 18th and 19th centuries is no longer valid with the return of language to itself. The paper holds that there is an inborn link between Nietzsche and Foucault in that man has created both God and Man so as to establish his own privilege and that after the deconstruction of them two aesthetic experience has come to be the quintessence of human life. |
| |
| Keywords: | Death of God Death of Man aestheticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
