首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

诉讼法角度抑制酷刑对策论纲
引用本文:樊崇义,艾静.诉讼法角度抑制酷刑对策论纲[J].南都学坛,2007,27(6):79-85.
作者姓名:樊崇义  艾静
作者单位:1. 中国政法大学,诉讼法学研究中心,北京,100471
2. 北京市海淀区,人民法院,北京,100071
摘    要:刑讯逼供是我国酷刑行为的典型存在方式,所以,遏制刑讯逼供是消除酷刑的关键环节。遏制刑讯逼供,要深入研究其产生和发展的历史、现状、原因。现阶段应当进一步确立无罪推定等诉讼原则,确立物证本位主义理念、非法证据排除规则、律师在场、讯问时录音录像等相关制度,加强诉讼行为理论研究,构建程序性裁判机制等多种途径,来实现对刑讯逼供行为的全面控制,为消灭酷刑这一国际义务做出努力,为建设和谐社会贡献薄力。

关 键 词:酷刑  刑讯逼供  无罪推定  物证本位  律师在场  程序性裁判
文章编号:1002-6320(2007)06-0079-07
收稿时间:2007-09-27

The Counterpolicy to Control Cruel Torture from the Perspective of Procedural Law
FAN Chong-yi,AI Jing.The Counterpolicy to Control Cruel Torture from the Perspective of Procedural Law[J].Academic forum of nandu,2007,27(6):79-85.
Authors:FAN Chong-yi  AI Jing
Abstract:Subjecting to torture is a typical example of cruel torture in China.Therefore,the key step to get rid of cruel torture is to control subjecting to torture.In order to control subjecting to torture,it is necessary to explore deeply the history,current state,and reasons of its formation and development. At present,the lawsuit principles such as the principle of presumption of innocence,principle of material evidence-centeredness,principle of eliminating illegal evidence,lawyer's presence,recording and videotaping while interrogating should be fixed further.At the same time,on the view of complete control over the activity of subjecting to torture,many means should be taken.For example,the study of lawsuit behavior should be strengthened,and the mechanism of procedural judgment should be constructed.If so,China can make her own effort to the international obligation of getting rid of cruel torture and contribution to the construction of harmonious society.
Keywords:cruel torture  subject to torture  presumption of innocence  physical evidence-centeredness  lawyer's presence  procedural judgment
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号