首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

受贿罪量刑失衡问题实证研究
引用本文:邵栋豪.受贿罪量刑失衡问题实证研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2017,34(3):116-123.
作者姓名:邵栋豪
作者单位:重庆工商大学 重庆廉政研究中心,重庆,400067
基金项目:2014 年度重庆市社科规划博士项目(2014BS044)"受贿罪量刑失衡问题研究",中国博士后科学基金第 58批面上资助项目(2015M582510)"我国商业欺诈犯罪立法问题研究",2016 年度重庆市教委重点项目(16SKDJ008)"从财产申报到财产监督:大数据背景下腐败预防新机制的构建"
摘    要:从司法实践看,受贿罪量刑存在严重失衡现象,造成这一状况的原因既有潜规则盛行的因素,又有错误司法的原因.同时,现行法律和司法解释本身存在的缺陷与不足是导致量刑失衡的制度性要素.革除受贿罪量刑失衡的弊端,应当通过司法解释限制法官在量刑中的自由裁量权、确立同种数罪并罚的处罚原则和将数额、情节(非量刑情节)作为量刑的基础这三方面上取得突破.

关 键 词:受贿罪  量刑失衡  潜规则  自由裁量权  反腐败

An Empirical Study on the Imbalance of Sentencing for the Crime of Taking Bribes
SHAO Donghao.An Empirical Study on the Imbalance of Sentencing for the Crime of Taking Bribes[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2017,34(3):116-123.
Authors:SHAO Donghao
Abstract:In judicial practice, the sentencing measurement for accepting bribes has serious imbalance, whose reasons for this situation result from both prevailing unspoken rules and judicial errors. At the same time, the defects and shortcomings of existing laws and judicial interpretations themselves are institutional factors for the imbalance in sentencing. The removal of the drawbacks of the imbalance for accepting bribes sentencing should restrict judges discretion in sentencing via judicial interpretation, and establish the principles for joinder of punishment for plural crimes, and take bribed amount and circumstences as the basis of the sentencing.
Keywords:acceptance of bribe  sentencing imbalances  unspoken rule  free discretionary right  anti-corruption
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号