首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

环境影响评价司法审查的正当性阐释
引用本文:田开友,阮丽娟. 环境影响评价司法审查的正当性阐释[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 36(1): 118-123. DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2015.01.018
作者姓名:田开友  阮丽娟
作者单位:(吉首大学 法学与公共管理学院,湖南 吉首 416000)
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(13XFX010);国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AFX023);湖南省社会科学基金项目(13YBA269)
摘    要:环境影响评价具有科技专业性、利益多元性等特征,使得环境行政机关在实施时拥有较大自由裁量权。面对环境行政机关的裁量判断,现行模糊的环境立法并没有为司法机关能否及如何审查环境影响评价提供精确指引,导致环境影响评价司法审查的正当性备受质疑。然而不可否认的是,法治国家中的权利无漏洞保护需求,分权原则不容许有不受约束的行政权力存在,以及司法权制约行政权政治框架中的正当行政程序标准等均为环境影响评价的司法审查提供了正当性基础。

关 键 词:环境影响评价  司法审查  正当行政程序  无漏洞保护  

Legitimate Illustration of Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment
TIAN Kaiyou , RUAN Lijuan. Legitimate Illustration of Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Science), 2015, 36(1): 118-123. DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2015.01.018
Authors:TIAN Kaiyou    RUAN Lijuan
Affiliation:(College of Law and Public Administration,Jishou University,Jishou 416000,Hunan China)
Abstract:Environmental impact assessment is characterized by scientific and technological specialty and multiple benefits,giving relatively large discretionary power to environmental administrative body in execution.However,the present vague environmental legislation fails to provide guidance for environmental impact assessment,leading to the query of the legitimacy of judicial review of environmental impact assessment.It is undeniable that in a country under the rule of law,legitimate illustration for environmental impact assessment can be found in the right of non-leaking protection,in the restricted administrative power under the decentralized principle,and in the legitimate administrative procedure under a political framework in which administrative power is restricted by judicial power.
Keywords:environmental impact assessment  judicial review  legitimate administrative procedure  non-leaking protection
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号