首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

也谈《焚书》原本的问题
引用本文:邬国平. 也谈《焚书》原本的问题[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 0(2)
作者姓名:邬国平
作者单位:复旦大学中国语言文学研究所 上海
摘    要:近有文章考证万历十八年《焚书》并没有刊刻;《焚书自序》的作者不是李贽,而是后人一篇伪作;又论述《焚书》原刻本只有两卷书信。对此文章提出不同的看法。认为《焚书》万历十八年已经刊刻流传,《焚书自序》应该是李贽的作品。《焚书》有广狭二义,狭义的《焚书》指书信,广义的《焚书》包括狭义的《焚书》(书信)和其他杂著,后者也称《老苦》,广义的《焚书》是书信和杂著《老苦》合刊本的总名。

关 键 词:李贽  《焚书》刻本  《焚书自序》

On the Original of Fen Shu
WU Guo-ping. On the Original of Fen Shu[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2004, 0(2)
Authors:WU Guo-ping
Abstract:LI Zhi's Fen Shu was published and spread in Wan Li 18 (B. C1590), Ming Dynasty. Author's preface of Fen Shu was written by Li Zhi himself. There're two meanings of Fen Shu. Its narrow sense just refers to the letters in this book. While broadly speaking, Fen Shu not only contains those letters but some other works as well, which are also known as Lao Ku. So Fen Shu should be considered as a whole name of both the letters and Lao Ku.
Keywords:LI Zhi  printed edition of Fen Shu  author's preface of Fen Shu  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号