| 关于违约责任不适合精神损害赔偿的反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘廷华. 关于违约责任不适合精神损害赔偿的反思[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 0(2): 51-55 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘廷华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宜宾学院政府管理学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 四川省教育厅科研项目“违约责任制度研究——法经济学视角”(0SB058)的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 研究表明，国内学者反对违约精神损害赔偿的理由无一成立。而且拒绝违约精神损害赔偿也与比较法上在不同程度地接受违约精神损害赔偿的做法大相径庭。事实上，违约精神损害赔偿完全符合合同法的立法宗旨，能更好地保护当事人的合法权益，有利于鼓励交易。
|
| 关 键 词： | 违约 精神损害赔偿 比较 合法权益 |
Reflection on Mental Damage Compensation not Being Suitable for Breach of Contract |
| |
| Liu Tinghua. Reflection on Mental Damage Compensation not Being Suitable for Breach of Contract[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2011, 0(2): 51-55 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Tinghua |
| |
| Affiliation: | Liu Tinghua(The Government Management College,Yibin University,Yibin 644000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper has showed that domestic scholars' objection to mental damage compensation for breach of contract is unjustifiable.Besides,the denial of mental damage compensation goes against the practice of wide recognition in varying degrees in many countries.In fact,mental damage compensation is in full compliance with the spirit of the legislative purpose of contract law;moreover,it can protect the clients' legitimate rights and interests and encourage trades. |
| |
| Keywords: | default mental damage compensation comparison legitimate rights and interests |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
