首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国刑法司法解释的不足与完善
引用本文:竹怀军.论我国刑法司法解释的不足与完善[J].学术交流,2004(7):25-28.
作者姓名:竹怀军
作者单位:韶关学院,法律系,广东,韶关,512005
摘    要:刑法司法解释在弥补我国刑法立法的不足、保持刑法的稳定、克服刑法规范的抽象性等方面发挥了巨大的作用。但我国现行的刑法司法解释违背罪刑法定原则,立法化、抽象化的现象十分严重。同时,刑法司法解释之间、刑法司法解释与我国刑法理论的通说之间存在着明显的冲突。部分刑法司法解释的方法也存在严重的不足。因此,司法机关对刑法进行司法解释必须遵循罪刑法定原则、合理性原则、明确性原则。

关 键 词:刑法  司法解释  完善
文章编号:1000-8284(2004)07-0025-04
修稿时间:2004年5月8日

On the Insufficiency and Soundness of the Judicial Interpretation of Our Criminal Law
ZHU Huai-jun.On the Insufficiency and Soundness of the Judicial Interpretation of Our Criminal Law[J].Academic Exchange,2004(7):25-28.
Authors:ZHU Huai-jun
Abstract:Judicial interpretations of the criminal law can amend the legislative insufficiency of our criminal law, keep the stabilization of the law and overcome its abstract standards; in these aspects, judicial interpretations has exerted a great impact. However, current judicial interpretation of criminal law violates the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime and makes the legislative and abstract trend more serious. Meanwhile, there are obvious conflicts between judicial interpretation and common practice of criminal-law theory, even among these interpretations. And a part of interpretations has severe shortness in methods. Therefore, while interpreting judicial articles, judicial institutions must follow the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime, of rationality and of clarity.
Keywords:criminal law  judicial interpretation  soundness
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号