首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Top-Down Civic Projects Are Not Grassroots Associations: How The Differences Matter in Everyday Life
Authors:Nina Eliasoph
Institution:(1) Department of Sociology, University of Southern California, Kaprielian Hall 352, 3620 South Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2539, USA
Abstract:Research on civic associations blurs an important distinction between the unfunded, informal, ongoing associations that theorists like de Tocqueville described versus current participatory democracy projects that are funded by the state and large nongovernmental organizations, are open to all, and are usually short-term. Based on a long-term ethnography of youth programs in the United States, this paper shows that entities like these, which participants and researchers alike often called “volunteer” or “civic” groups, operate very differently from traditional civic groups. The ethnography systematically details prevalent tensions that actors face when they try to cultivate the civic spirit in these increasingly typical organizations.
Contact Information Nina EliasophEmail:
Keywords:Participatory democracy  Civic associations  Hybrid governance  Empowerment  Volunteering  United States
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号