首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论“文明冲突论”与“软权力论”之间的辩论
引用本文:曹升生. 论“文明冲突论”与“软权力论”之间的辩论[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 9(3): 141-144
作者姓名:曹升生
作者单位:渤海大学,历史系,辽宁,锦州,121013
摘    要:塞缪尔·亨廷顿认为约瑟夫.奈将软权力与硬权力截然分开并大肆渲染的做法有违常理,其用心是要强调非西方国家在现代化过程中日益本土化,进而对西方世界构成威胁。与此同时,约瑟夫.奈认为冷战后的世界政治中存在超国家的、国家的和次国家的三种认同危机,而塞缪尔.亨廷顿在"文明冲突论"中所强调的文明认同只是其中之一。辩论从本质上揭示了美国国际关系学者对美国外交应对方略的深入思考。

关 键 词:辩论  文明冲突论  软权力论  美国例外论  认同
文章编号:1009-105X(2007)03-0141-04
修稿时间:2007-08-30

Debate Between "The Conflicts of Civilization" and "Soft Power"
CAO Sheng-sheng. Debate Between "The Conflicts of Civilization" and "Soft Power"[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences), 2007, 9(3): 141-144
Authors:CAO Sheng-sheng
Abstract:Samuel Huntington considers Mr Nye' s clear distinction between the soft power and the hard power and his exaggeration of the two to be irrational.His aim was to stress that the Non-west are becoming stronger by modernization and challenging the western leadership.Mr Nye thinks that there exist three kinds of identity crisis in current world politics,and the civilization identity Mr Huntingon put emphasis on is just one kind.In essence,the debate explains the fact that the American scholars majoring in IR are doing their best to give excellent advice on how American diplomacy should be in order to deal with the globalization.
Keywords:debate,"  Conflicts of Civilization"  ,"  Soft Power"  ,American Exc
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号