认罪认罚案件被告人上诉权的限定问题

认罪认罚从宽制度给予了被告人程序和实体上的双重从宽,以激励其自愿认罪认罚.认罪被告人拥有上诉权不仅是对其个人权益的保护,而且是“以审判为中心”制度改革的内在要求.虽然认罪被告人提出上诉在一定程度上是对一审程序的推翻,但现阶段该制度发展并不完善,办案人员存在认识片面、经验不足等方面的问题,当前完全剥夺认罪被告人的上诉权是不现实的.但从该制度发展的长远角度来看,对认罪被告人的上诉权进行限定是完善该制度的内在要求.为平衡二者之间的矛盾,在立法模式上,应以我国基本国情为基础,外部为被告人自愿作出认罪认罚完善相应保障条件,内部对上诉的理由进行列举式的规定,并合理地借鉴域外国家在相应制度下对被告人上诉权限制的规定,以便在司法实践中更好地贯彻落实认罪认罚从宽制度.

The Limitation of the Defendant's Right of Appeal in the Case of Guilty Penalty

The leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment gives the defendant both procedural and substantive leniency to encourage them to voluntarily plead guilty and punishment. The defendant who pleads guilty has the right of appeal. It is not only the protection of his personal rights and interests, but also the inherent requirement of the reform of the "trial centered" system. Although the defendant''s appeal to a certain extent is the overthrow of the first instance procedure, the development of the system is not perfect at this stage, and the investigators have some problems, such as one-sided understanding and lack of experience. At present, it is unrealistic to completely deprive the plea defendant of the right of appeal. However, from the long-term perspective of the development of the system, it is the inherent requirement to limit the right of appeal of the guilty defendant. In order to balance the contradiction, we should take the basic national conditions of our country as the basis, make confession and punishment voluntarily for the defendant outside, improve the corresponding guarantee conditions, list the reasons for appeal inside, and learn from the regulations of foreign countries on the limitation of the defendant''s right of appeal under the corresponding system reasonably, so as to better implement the confession and punishment in judicial practice leniency system.