首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法律的“无为”之“有用”
引用本文:聂长建.法律的“无为”之“有用”[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(4):139-144.
作者姓名:聂长建
作者单位:中南民族大学法学院,武汉,430074
基金项目:中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“孔子法律思想的当代诠释”(CSY14003)
摘    要:只以“有”的形态存在并处处在生活中扩张的法律是相当危险的,既无益于秩序之维护,又无助于正义之实现。好的法律,不能仅仅只以“有”的方式存在,更多的是以“无”的方式存在。“有为而治”也是法律“父爱主义”的极端化,出于追求自由的本性,生活中只有一小部分领域属于法律的调整范围,大部分领域属于自主选择的私人空间,法律对这部分领域是“无”为。只强调法律的“有为”而忽视法律的“无为”,势必造成法律与自由的对立,只有在强调法律“有为”的同时又重视法律的“无为”,才是对法律全面和正确的认识,才能实现法律保障自由的价值。

关 键 词:法律  有为  无为  自由
收稿时间:2014/3/24 0:00:00

The Usefulness of Legal Effortlessness
NIE Changjian.The Usefulness of Legal Effortlessness[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2015,17(4):139-144.
Authors:NIE Changjian
Institution:1.School of Law, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China
Abstract:A law that only builds up itself and exists everywhere in life is dangerous which can neither maintain order nor realize justice. The good law not only “exists” in form, but also exists more in “non-existence”. “Doing to rule” is the extreme of “paternalism” in the field of law. Because of the human nature to pursue liberty, only a small part of life belongs to the proper sphere of law, while the major part belongs to the private sphere of self-decision in which the law does nothing. Emphasizing the law's exertion while ignoring its “inaction” is bound to cause the conflict between law and liberty. Only by putting emphasis on the “active” law while attaching great importance to law's “inaction” can a comprehensive and correct understanding of the law be achieved and the value of law in protecting liberty be realized.
Keywords:law  promising  inaction  liberty
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号