自由之否证与拘束之提倡：法官裁量权辨正

日常生活中的裁量并不自由,其针对的是自由限度之外的事项,要求具备辨别能力的行为人以周知的一般规则进行衡量和判断。法官裁量权是法官的一种审判权力,权力扩张的本性决定其必须受到限制。拘束是法官裁量权的应有品格,独立是法官裁量权行使的前提。法官必须以自己的良知去感知正义的内容,并以此为指引去认定案件事实,理解和适用法律,且必须公开判决的具体理由,以保证法官裁量权的正当行使。

Negative Proof of Freedom and Advocating Imposing Constraints on the Judicial Discretion of Judge

There is no freedom in ordinary discretion that requests the rational people to judge the terms outside the freedom.Judicial discretion is the power of judge,which should be restricted because of its inherent aggression.Independence is the premise of judicial discretion,but the judge must apperceive the justice with his conscience,by which he can know the action and understand the laws,then he should open the syllabi in order to use the judicial discretion reasonably.