| 科斯与塔洛克、交易成本与寻租成本：一个比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李政军.科斯与塔洛克、交易成本与寻租成本：一个比较分析[J].江苏社会科学,2002,35(1):43-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李政军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学商学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科斯的《企业的性质》和塔洛克的《关税、垄断和偷窃的福利成本》都是现代经济学中的开创性论文。前者因提出了交易成本的思想 ,直接为交易成本经济学乃至整个新制度经济学奠定了坚实的理论基础 ;后者因提出了寻租成本的思想 ,直接为寻租经济学乃至整个公共选择理论奠定了理论基础。本文从作者的学术背景、写作风格和使用的核心分析工具三个方面对这两篇论文提供一个全面比较分析。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科斯 塔洛克 交易成本 寻租成本 |
A Comparative Analysis: R. Coase and G. Tullock,Trade Cost and Rent-seeking Cost |
| |
| Li Zhengjun.A Comparative Analysis: R. Coase and G. Tullock,Trade Cost and Rent-seeking Cost[J].Jiangsu Social Sciences,2002,35(1):43-50. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Zhengjun |
| |
| Institution: | Li Zhengjun |
| |
| Abstract: | Their papers are creative in modern economics. The former proposes the idea of trade cost, which becomes the solid foundation of the economics of trade cost and new system. The latter proposes the idea of charter-seeking cost, ,which becomes the theoretical foundation of the economics of charter-seeking and the whole public choice. This paper offers a comprehensive analysis on the two papers from the aspects of the writers' academic background, writing style and the kernel analytical devices. |
| |
| Keywords: | R Coase G Tullick trade cost charter-seeking cost |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
