首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

证明责任分配规则的本土化展开——以幽灵抗辩的应对方案为中心的考察
引用本文:戴承欢. 证明责任分配规则的本土化展开——以幽灵抗辩的应对方案为中心的考察[J]. 东方论坛, 2010, 0(3): 116-122
作者姓名:戴承欢
作者单位:湖南文理学院,湖南,常德,415000
摘    要:刑事诉讼中的证明责任,一般而言是由控诉方承担,这是一个基本的原则。而被告人不负证明责任,则符合无罪推定以及保护被告人权利的证据规则。然而,僵化的证明责任的分配原则给控诉方带来了很大的负担。幽灵抗辩的出现使得这种证明成为控诉方不能承受之重,证明责任分配的公平游戏规则此时已经变得不再公平了。刑事证明规则应当借鉴英美证据法上出现的"积极抗辩"理论,来修正原先过于僵化的证明责任规则,并最终来解决这个困境。

关 键 词:幽灵抗辩  刑事诉讼  被告人  证明责任

Countermeasures of the Ghost Defense: The Burden Of Proof of the Defendant in the Criminal Procedure
DAI Cheng-huan. Countermeasures of the Ghost Defense: The Burden Of Proof of the Defendant in the Criminal Procedure[J]. Orient Forum, 2010, 0(3): 116-122
Authors:DAI Cheng-huan
Affiliation:DAI Cheng-huan (Hunan Institute of Arts and Science,Changde 415000,China)
Abstract:The burden of proof should be on principle assumed by the accuser in criminal litigation.However,with the development of litigation,under a particular condition,there is the situation that the burden of proof of the accused in criminal litigation.In legislation and practice of foreign countries,there are prescripts in which the burden of proof should be undertaken by the assumed.But the relative prescript in China is not specific,and it is not something of united recognition in theory.Therefore, research in this field is very vital to the legislation and practice in our country.
Keywords:ghost defense  criminal procedure  defendant  burden of proof
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号