首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

根本违约问题研究
引用本文:解冲. 根本违约问题研究[J]. 西北第二民族学院学报, 2003, 13(2): 68-72
作者姓名:解冲
作者单位:清华大学法学院 北京100084
摘    要:对根本违约的评判标准进行比较研究 ,今天结果主义已经取代条款主义成为主流的判定标准 ,德国式的具体判定标准更为科学。在结果主义内部 ,可以分为“单纯结果主义”和“与可预见性标准结合的结果主义” ,本文认为可预见性标准的要求是不尽合理的 ,在考虑根本违约免责条款效力的问题时 ,应考虑不同性质的合同中的免责条款 ;并对我国的立法进行简单评价 ,提出相关建议。

关 键 词:根本违约  免责条款  我国合同法
文章编号:1008-2883(2003)02-0068-05
修稿时间:2003-03-12

Research on Fundamental Breach of Contract
XIE Chong. Research on Fundamental Breach of Contract[J]. Journal of The Second Northwest Institute For Ethnic Minorities(Philosophy and Social Science), 2003, 13(2): 68-72
Authors:XIE Chong
Abstract:The first part of this thesis mainly makes a comparative research on the standard of judgment of fundamental breach of contract,and draws the conclusion that doctrine of result has already replaced doctrine of item and becomes the main standard. As to the doctrine of result,specific standard of judgment is more reasonable. The doctrine of result can be divided into "pure doctrine of result"and "doctrine of result with foreseeability". The author argues that foreseeability is unreasonable.In the second part ,the author makes a research on the relationship between fundamental breach of contract and exemption clauses according to the author's standingpoint. When we consider the validity of exemption clause under the condition of fundamental breach of contract ,the type of the contract must be taken into account.Finally,this thesis makes a simple evaluation on contract law of PRC and raises the related suggestions.
Keywords:fundamental breach of contract  exemption clauses  contract law of PRC
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号