首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《明史》人物登科年代考误
引用本文:陈长文. 《明史》人物登科年代考误[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 6(6): 52-55
作者姓名:陈长文
作者单位:浙江大学人文学院古籍研究所,浙江,杭州,310028
摘    要:明代是中国科举制度的鼎盛时期。《明史》对人物登科年代的记载绝大多数是正确的,但也有个别错误。从明代进士登科录、进士同年录、会试录及进士题名碑等原始文献来看,这些科年错误可分为两类:一类是本无该科,另一类是误为他科。

关 键 词:《明史》人物  登科年代  本无该科  误为他科
文章编号:1009-4474(2005)06-0052-04
修稿时间:2005-05-20

A Textual Research on the Year Some Candidates in The History of Ming Dynasty Succeeded in the Highest Imperial Examinations
CHEN Chang-wen. A Textual Research on the Year Some Candidates in The History of Ming Dynasty Succeeded in the Highest Imperial Examinations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong Universit(Social Science Edition), 2005, 6(6): 52-55
Authors:CHEN Chang-wen
Abstract:The Chinese imperial examination reached its climax in Ming Dynasty.The great majority of the records about the years candidates succeeded in the highest(imperial) examinations is correct,but there also appear a few mistakes.Based on such literature as the record of successful candidates in the highest examinations in Ming Dynasty,the chronological record of successful candidates in the highest(imperial) examinations,the record of successful candidates in the metropolitan examinations,and on the stone tablets inscribed by successful candidates,the mistakes can be grouped into two categories: a(mistaken) year in which there was no highest imperial(examination) and a wrong record of the year of the examination.
Keywords:successful candidates in The History of Ming Dynasty  the year a candidate succeeded in the highest imperial examinations  a year of no highest imperial examination  a wrong record of the year of the examination  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号