首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论监听作为取证手段的法律问题
引用本文:徐晶.论监听作为取证手段的法律问题[J].重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版),2005,17(5):703-706.
作者姓名:徐晶
作者单位:华东政法学院研究生院 上海200042
摘    要:监听对于侦查机关打击和惩罚犯罪发挥了极其重要的作用。但同时监听也是一把双刃剑,如对监听不加任何限制的采用又会严重侵犯公民的隐私权。因此,各国大都对监听的采用规定了严格的法律程序,以防止侦查机关滥用监听。我国虽然在侦查实践中对监听措施经常采用,但在刑事诉讼立法上对监听缺乏明确规定。规范监听立法及在证据效力上对其正确定位业已成为改革与完善侦查措施以及刑事证据制度的当务之急。

关 键 词:监听  监听原则  供述证据  证明地位
文章编号:1009-1289(2005)05-0703-04
修稿时间:2004年11月13

On the Juridical Questions of Monitoring as a Way of Collect Evidence
XU Jing.On the Juridical Questions of Monitoring as a Way of Collect Evidence[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition),2005,17(5):703-706.
Authors:XU Jing
Abstract:Monitoring plays a very important role in combating and punishing crime.However,it is also a double-edged sword,will seriously violate civic privacy if without restriction.Thus,many countries made strict juridical process for monitoring to avoid the abuse of monitoring by scouting organs.Although monitoring is often used in scouting,clear regulation is absent in legislation of penal suit.Make criteria for legislation of monitoring and correctly oriented it in the validity of evidence are urgent affairs in reforming and perfecting scouting methods and the system of criminal evidence
Keywords:monitoring  rules of monitoring  testimonial evidence  testifying status  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号