Finite Alternating-Move Arbitration Schemes and the Equal Area Solution |
| |
Authors: | Nejat Anbarci |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Economics, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL 33199, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We start by considering the Alternate Strike (AS) scheme, a real-life arbitration scheme where two parties select an arbitrator by alternately crossing off at each round one name from a given panel of arbitrators. We find out that the AS scheme is not invariant to “bad” alternatives. We then consider another alternating-move scheme, the Voting by Alternating Offers and Vetoes (VAOV) scheme, which is invariant to bad alternatives. We fully characterize the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome sets of these above two schemes in terms of the rankings of the parties over the alternatives only. We also identify some of the typical equilibria of these above two schemes. We then analyze two additional alternating-move schemes in which players’ current proposals have to either honor or enhance their previous proposals. We show that the first scheme’s equilibrium outcome set coincides with that of the AS scheme, and the equilibrium outcome set of the second scheme coincides with that of the VAOV scheme. Finally, it turns out that all schemes’ equilibrium outcome sets converge to the Equal Area solution’s outcome of cooperative bargaining problem, if the alternatives are distributed uniformly over the comprehensive utility possibility set and as the number of alternatives tends to infinity. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: C72. |
| |
Keywords: | The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) the Alternate Strike (AS) scheme the Voting by Alternating Offers and Vetoes (VAOV) scheme the Enhancing Past Concessions scheme the Honoring Past Concessions scheme the Equal Area solution |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|