首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

历史的解构与重构:泛化“封建”的话语分析
引用本文:吴宗杰.历史的解构与重构:泛化“封建”的话语分析[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2008,61(5):522-527.
作者姓名:吴宗杰
作者单位:浙江大学当代中国话语研究中心,浙江杭州310058
摘    要:“封建”泛化与封建话语的形成有关。该话语构造了现代史学的知识空间、表征结构与作为进化的直线时间观,与《易经》为代表的民族史学思维格格不入,但却渗透于现代汉语变迁的整个历史过程,并取得能对中国文化进行诠释和支配的话语权。由此,用“封建”作为中国历史的断代词语,或者给今天中国传统文化现象进行定性,都只是没有任何历史和文化根据的当代话语游戏而已。

关 键 词:封建  史学话语  新词

Deconstructing & Reconstructing History: Generalization of "Feudalism" as a Historical Term
Wu Zongjie.Deconstructing & Reconstructing History: Generalization of "Feudalism" as a Historical Term[J].Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences),2008,61(5):522-527.
Authors:Wu Zongjie
Institution:Wu Zongjie (Contemporary Chinese Discourse Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China)
Abstract:: By comparing the differences of historical world views between the modern West and the ancient China, it is revealed that this phenomenon is attributed to the emergence of Feudalist discourse which creates a space of knowing, the structure of representation, and an assumption of seeing time as a lineal process of evolution. Such a discourse is irrelevant to the Chinese tradition and in sharp conflict with the history composed under the influence of Yijing. Nevertheless, the discourse penetrates the whole process of transforming the modern Chinese language, obtaining a power to dominate the Chinese culture and its interpretation. Therefore attempts to use Fengjian as a term to name a stage of Chinese history or evaluate Chinese culture should be regarded purely as a contemporary discursive game without any historical or cultural foundation.
Keywords:feudalism  historical discourse  neologism
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号