| 对我国缔约过失责任理论的两点质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 魏盛礼,匡爱民.对我国缔约过失责任理论的两点质疑[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,34(2):45-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 魏盛礼 匡爱民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南昌大学,法学院,江西,南昌,330047
2. 中央民族大学,法学院,北京,100081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 缔约过失责任的承担,不以存在有效合同关系为前提。缔约过失责任的基础在于诚信原则。诚信原则仅对合同自由原则起限制和补充作用。这两个原则平衡的结果要求,缔约过失责任的主观构成要件仅限于故意和重大过失,一般过失和轻微过失不构成缔约过失责任。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合同法 缔约过失 有效合同关系 合同自由 诚信原则 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0448(2003)02-0045-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年12月20 |
Two Queries about Theory of Responsibility in Signing a Contract with Fault in Our Country |
| |
| Abstract: | One will not take the responsibility on the basis of the valid existing contract for his fault while signing a contract.The foundation of this responsibility is based on the principle of honesty and reputation. The principle is restriction and complement to the principle of contract freedom.The balance of the two principles requires that the responsibility take effect when one has serious fault on purpose excluding the cases of small fault. |
| |
| Keywords: | contract law fault in signing a contract valid contract relation contract freedom principle of honesty and reputation serious fault |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
