“革命”位置及“丸山悖论”——丸山昇中国现代文学研究述评

丸山昇是知名的中国现代文学研究者,在其学术著作中,＂革命＂占据了非常重要的位置,事实上,在日本战后“悔恨共同体”的情绪底色中,“革命”作为一种主题已经实际内化于丸山昇本人及其研究之中。此外,丸山昇在对“革命”进行细微辨析和宏观思考的过程中,还达成了对“革命”的深层次认同;同时,丸山昇超越了“竹内鲁迅”的“文学者”概念,建构了“革命人鲁迅”也是极具学术敏感力的选择。最后,从最深广的人性关怀出发,丸山昇始终保持了对“革命”中“人”及其选择的考察与思考,但在这一过程中又一直存在着某种矛盾,即如果拒绝了抽象原则,＂革命＂的动力将从何而来的问题,我们可以称之为“丸山悖论”。

THE POSITION OF "REVOLUTION"AND "M ARUYAM A PARADOX"Comment on Maruyama Noboru's Research of Chinese Modern Literature

As a famous Japanese scholar who research Chinese modem literature, Maruyama Noboru has spent all his life on the ＂revolution＂ in China. The theme of ＂revolution＂ has a very important position in Maruyama＇s works. What is more, from reading Maruyama＇s books, we can see that he reached a deeper recognition of China＇s revolution. At the same time, Maruyama was far beyond ＂Takeuchi-Luxun＂ （＂literature-luxun＂）, and constructed the new concept： ＂revolutionary-Luxun＂. This can prove that Maruyama has a far-reaching academic vision. However, from the investigation on ＂people＂ in ＂revolution＂ and their choice, Maruyama Noboru is always in a contradiction -- ＂Maruyama paradox＂, which is to say that we should answer this question：if we reject abstract principles, where does the power of ＂revolution＂ come from？