论类案的相似性判断标准——以最高人民检察院探索建立类案监督机制为背景

类案同判构成了现代法治的基础，也是社会追求的司法目标。实现类案同判是近年来司法改革的重要内容，探索建构类案监督制度就是以此为基础。然而，与检察系统积极探索建构类案监督制度的热情相比，类案监督制度的实施情况却不理想，原因就在于没有相应的适用方法来指导类案监督制度的运行。当前，建构类案监督制度运作机制，应将重心放在确定类案的相似性判断标准上。类案的相似性判断必须解决类案是什么、如何判定类案、需相似到何种程度三个问题。类案判定的核心在于待比较案件之间相关性特征的可接受性。

The Standard of Similarity Determination of Similar Cases——the Supreme People's Procuratorate's Exlporation of Supervision Mechanism for Similar Cases

“Unifying the application of law to similar cases” constitutes the basis of modern rule of law and the judicial goal pursued by the public, and is also the important content of judicial reform in recent years, on which the supervision system of similar cases has been developed. However, despite the enthusiasm of the judicial organs on the establishment of supervision system for similar cases, the operation of the supervision system for similar cases in the judicial practice did go smoothly. One of the main reasons is that there is no corresponding applicable method to guide the operation of the supervision system of similar cases. The key point of the application of the supervision system of similar cases lies in the determination of similarity of cases. Three questions must be answered to determine the similarity of similar cases:What is a "similar case"? How to determine similar cases? To what degree do the cases are similar? The core of the determination of similar cases lies in the acceptability of the relevance between the cases to be compared.